RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02595
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Fitness Assessments (FAs) dated 4 Oct 2010 and 27 Jul 2011
be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
On Sep 2011, he was diagnosed with exercise induced asthma,
and was not correctly profiled at the time of the FAs dated
4 Oct 2010 and 27 Jul 2011.
In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his
fitness history, and an extract from his medical records.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in
the grade of technical sergeant (TSgt, E-6).
________________________________________________________________
THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. DPSIM states that on 29 Jun 2012,
a memorandum was sent to the applicant requesting additional
documentation. Specifically, copies of his AF Form 469, Duty
Limiting Condition Report; AF Form 422, Notification of Air
Force Member's Qualification Status; AF Form 108, Physical
Fitness Education and Intervention Processing, copies of his
signed fitness score sheet and fitness questionnaire. The
member did not provide the requested documentation.
After further review of his fitness history, DPSIM states that
he had a passing FA dated 3 Jan 2011, which was in between his
failed FAs dated 4 Oct 2010 and 27 Jul 2011. He also passed his
FA, dated 24 Oct 2011 while taking all four components of the
FA. On 18 Apr 2012, he failed his FA while taking all four
components. Three months later he was exempt from the cardio,
push-up, and sit-up components of his FA dated 12 Jul 2012 and
passed.
The complete DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit B.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 30 Oct 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded
to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. As of
this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit
C).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. After
thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the
applicants contentions, we are not persuaded the contested FAs
are in error or unjust. The medical documentation provided by
the applicant is noted; however, it was rendered several months
after the contested FAs. As such, this evidence does not
persuade us that he had a duty limiting condition that prevented
his successful completion of the contested Fas. Therefore, in
the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to
recommend favorable consideration of his request..
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application
in Executive Session on 24 Jan 2013, under the provisions of AFI
36-2603:
XXXXXXX, Panel Chair
XXXXXXX, Member
XXXXXXX, Member
The following documentary evidence pertaining to Docket number
BC-2012-02595 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 11 Jun 2012, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 10 Oct 2012.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 Oct 2012.
XXXXXXX
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01591
On 29 Nov 2011, a medical evaluation letter was signed by the same provider who issued the previous AF Form 469s. The letter states, There are medical conditions that preclude this member from achieving a passing score on the Air Force fitness assessment. On 1 Dec 2011, an AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, was initiated from his Medical Provider, which could exempt the applicant from the cardio and push-up components of the FA. On 27 Mar 2012, a medical evaluation letter was...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01461
from the Unit CC. On 16 Dec 13, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB) due to Insufficient evidence; specifically AF Form 422 and medical documents to support the request. While the applicant has provided the results of this medical review, indicating that he had a medical condition precluding him from achieving a passing score, this in and of itself, does not convince us the contested FAs should be invalidated. Moreover, we find no...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03968
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03968 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 15 Dec 2010, 15 Mar 2011, and 13 Jun 2011, Unsatisfactory Fitness Assessments (FAs) be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). However, the applicant has not provided similar evidence to support that his FAs should be...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03968
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03968 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 15 Dec 2010, 15 Mar 2011, and 13 Jun 2011, Unsatisfactory Fitness Assessments (FAs) be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). However, the applicant has not provided similar evidence to support that his FAs should be...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02960
An AF Form 422 dated 5 Oct 11 with the following statement: Cleared for the following AF Fitness assessment components: Ht, Wt, AC, 1.0 mile walk. The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial, indicating there is no documentation provided by the applicants commander to invalidate the contested FA. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 24 Jan 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02587
In support of his claim, the applicant has submitted a letter from his UFPM and a Standard Form 600, Chronological Record of Medical care, indicating that he had an illness, precluding him from finishing and passing the contested FA and memorandum from his UFPM (not dated) to the Force Support Squadron commander requesting removal of the contested FA from AFFMS. If an AF Form 422 is required, an additional 7 days will be allowed for the AF Form 422 to be generated and provided. A list of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02382
Members must test by the last day of the month, six calendar months following the previous passing test (e.g., if member tested on 15 April, then member must retest on/before 31 October of the same year. With a RNLTD date of 30 May 11, the applicant was not required to test prior to his scheduled FA and was allowed 42 days after the RNLTD date to test, but was not required to do so. DPSIM concludes that the contested FA is a legitimate unsatisfactory score, in accordance with AFI 36-2905,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01787
The medical documents mentioned above validates the applicant had a medical condition that precluded him from achieving a passing score on the contested FA. DPSIM indicates he has not provided documentation from his medical provider stating his medical condition would prevent him from achieving a passing score on the contested FA. In this respect, the applicant failed to provide a letter from his medical provider stating how his medical condition prevented him from passing the AC component...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03248
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicants military records are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C, and D. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant's request to change or void the contested EPR. DPSID states the applicant did not file an appeal through the Evaluation Report Appeals Board...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-00021
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C, D, E, and G. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request to remove his 19 Feb 2010 FA from the AFFMS. DPSIM states the applicant is requesting his FA dated 19 Feb 2010 be removed from the AFFMS. The complete DPSID evaluation, with...